Corporate Info // Press Reviews
Comparison Test -
PC-Professionell
(May 2, 2005)
The German Magazine PC-Professionell has reviewed SecureDoc in its disk
encryption product comparison. Time and time again, and also in this test,
SecureDoc turns out to be one of the most reliable, feature-rich, secure and
versatile full disk encryption solutions worldwide. In this particular test,
which was very thorough and objective, we feel that some important disk
encryption product features have been overlooked.
In the article, it is stated that SecureDoc, which stores keys in a key
file, is not as secure as other products that save keys in inaccessible,
hidden locations.
- Although it is true that SecureDoc key files can be seen or
accessed, this is not a security flaw at all. In fact, if we use the
widely-used and widely-scrutinized encryption of email as a model, it is
clear that SecureDoc follows the same basic principles. Standard email
products such as Microsoft Outlook use files to contain the user's private
key file, and open cryptographic standards such as PKCS #12 to help protect
these key files even though they can be accessed. We do not consider a key
file to be "sensitive material" because its protection is based on
cryptography.
- Anyone with Administration rights on the client machine can see the
key file. A regular user would not be able to see or access SecureDoc key
files.
- For the protection of a user's data, WinMagic has designed SecureDoc
so that even WinMagic, the manufacturer, cannot access users' computers.
Knowing all the obscure space where key files are stored would not help
WinMagic attack its SecureDoc product - cryptography helps make encryption
products secure based on security, not on obscurity.
The weakest link in this security design is the user's password. In addition
to including the ability to require users to create strong passwords,
SecureDoc offers a unique integration to the high level of security offered
by smart cards, USB cryptographic tokens and PKI.
SecureDoc has been designed since the beginning based on open standards,
where they have been available. Its network product, SecureDoc Enterprise
Server, also conforms to this ideal, using a standard ODBC-based SQL server.
WinMagic is of the opinion that using a standard database is better than
proprietary databases or even flat files, which are used by other products.
Comparing it unfavorably to products that use proprietary designs implies
that such designs are desirable, which we strongly feel is not true.
The article raised issues of performance, a SecureDoc quality that is often
highly praised by customers. SecureDoc has two encryption modes: one is more
thorough than another, but it runs more slowly. In this test, it may have
been possible that SecureDoc was tested using this more thorough mode while
competitive products may have been tested with less thorough modes. Also,
SecureDoc's ability to allow interruption of the initial encryption does
have some impact on encryption performance: do the other products offer such
a feature? And the performance on the day to day operations, we suspect, may
have been affected by using file encryption on top of disk encryption.
Two more minor points. Integration with third party token manufacturers is a
major feature of SecureDoc: perhaps this review should have involved using
tokens, which are becoming widely used. And although the stand-alone
SecureDoc offers self-help challenge-response password reset only, the
enterprise version does have a complete one-time challenge/response feature.
We hope these comments will be taken in the spirit they are intended.
WinMagic Inc.