AES-NI Validation

WinMagic has a long and successful history of data encryption – pretty sure I’ve said this before. One of the key things we work to ensure is compliance and certification with things such as the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) which is managed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

If you’re not familiar with the CMVP here’s an explanation taken directly from their site:

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) established the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) that validates cryptographic modules to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)140-1 Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, and other FIPS cryptography based standards. The CMVP is a joint effort between NIST and the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC). FIPS 140-2, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, was released on May 25, 2001 and supersedes FIPS 140-1.

Modules validated as conforming to FIPS 140-1 and FIPS 140-2 are accepted by the Federal Agencies of both countries for the protection of sensitive information.

We were the first encryption vendor meet the Advanced Encryption Standard Algorithm Validation requirement, you can see our certification here – note that it’s Certificate #1. Of course, we also ensured our cryptographic engines in the past have met FIPS 140-1 and 140-2 requirements.

With the release of SecureDoc 6.1, we introduced a new AES-NI cryptographic engine. We’ve been anxiously awaiting the finalization of our FIPS 140-2 process review and last week we received word that our new cryptographic engine received NIST approval.

Now customers can rest assured SecureDoc 6.1 is fully 140-2 compliant. Our Windows certificate number is 1880 and our Mac OS X certificate number is 1881.

Previous Post
Constant Improvement
Next Post
Happy Valentine’s Day! Why Marketers Love Data Encryption!

Related Posts

Making the Case for Data Encryption

In August, we released the results of a survey we did with the Ponemon Institute where we examined the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for data encryption. To make this information even clearer, we’ve now created a handy, easy to…

Keeping the random in RNG

Earlier this week my colleague Garry talked about his experiences attending the TCG conference recently and the ‘hallway talk’ about the NSA. It raised some good observations and had me thinking about a recent blog from the NY Times about…
Read more

Building Support

We’ve teased about the SecureDoc updates coming next week, but it’s going to be more than just about updates to our software. (more…)
Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Menu